“We can’t get to the $4 trillion in savings that we need by just cutting the 12 percent of the budget that pays for things like medical research and education funding and food inspectors and the weather service. And we can’t just do it by making seniors pay more for Medicare.”
-Barack Obama

“The curious thing is Americans don’t mind individual mandates when they come in the form of payroll taxes to buy mandatory public insurance. In fact, that’s the system we call Social Security and Medicare, and both are so popular politicians dare not touch them.”
-Robert Reich

“I believe keeping our promises should be our highest priority and that means saving Social Security and Medicare while preserving the American dream for our children and grandchildren.”
-Tom Coburn

“We know that Medicare’s going broke in seven years, but we need to start over. That’s what the American people want us to do.”
-John McCain

Medicare Will Never Run Out of Money
Not long ago, I wrote about the fact that the U.S. Government’s own forecasts predict a time when the Medicare Trust Fund will be depleted, leading to either large increases in taxes, significant reductions in benefits, or both. Following that message, a friend wrote to me, “Dave, why are you being such an alarmist? We’ve been hearing about things like Social Security and Medicare running out of money since Reagan was President.”

And you know what…my friend is right. Actually, the alarm bells were ringing just a couple of years after Medicare became law. But the truth is that Medicare will never run out of money—you and
I will pay for it, one way or another.

I asked one of my interns to plot a different chart for me. He went all the way back to the earliest days of projections for the Medicare Trust Fund D-Day (depletion-day) and plotted the time remaining by year. Turns out, my friend was right, it has been an up and down kind of picture. I needed to understand why. As it turns out, a few of the same recurring things account for the variability:

  1. During times of economic growth, we increase revenue projections, without believing they’ll come down. They always do.
  2. We raise taxes.
  3. We cut payments.

Interestingly, back in the late 90s it seems that we cut too deep and reversed the pressure on prices by deciding to pay physicians more. That should be a present-day warning to us. The system is capable of resisting government pressure on prices. That, in turn, should remind us that the only true system capable of driving down prices is market forces, not government proclamations.

Looking at this year’s projections, we see a steady decline in the balance of the Trust Fund, which comes at a time of:

  • Sustained economic recovery/growth, which should put income tax revenues near a peak (the recent tax cuts are included in the projection).
  • Near 100% employment, which means payroll taxes do not have room to grow beyond projections (payroll taxes fund Medicare).
  • Increased revenues from the ACA’s increased payroll taxes.

The projection is for the Medicare Trust Fund’s depletion-day is just 8 years away.

Now, like I said in the title, Medicare will never actually run out of money—because it never really had any to begin with. The Medicare Trust Fund is merely an accounting concept. One way or another, the Federal Government will fund Medicare, though it will take an Act of Congress to do so. That Act can only do one of a few things:

  1. Raise taxes
  2. Cut benefits
  3. Borrow money

That’s it. Those are the three choices. We’ve already seen that the Federal Government is not capable of actually driving prices down, though I’m sure we will continue to hear that it is. If you think there’s partisanship and stagnation in Washington right now, just wait until decisions have to be made about how to keep Medicare benefits flowing. If Democrats are in power, you can bet that we’ll see big increases in taxes and, very likely, some version of universal healthcare (ObamaCare on steroids). And if Republicans are in power, you can bet we’ll see big cuts to benefits, and likely a lot of borrowing (while Republicans claim to be fiscally conservative, that really only means that they don’t want to raise taxes. They seem to have no problem borrowing money when they are in power).

Or, we can do something about it. We can force transparent pricing that creates competition and allows the marketplace to drive down prices. These are the choices. There are no others. The time has come to act. Please join us.

“We need real leadership, Democrat, Republican and independent to stand up and say, we have to live within our means.”
-Tom Coburn

“The largest party in America, by the way, is neither the Democrats nor the Republicans. It’s the party of non-voters.”
-Robert Reich



Here is a story that flies directly in the face of a common, albeit laughable, suggestion that “if people saw the prices of emergency services, they might not seek care when needed.”

While laughable, it’s one that is repeated often by hospitals with absolutely no evidence to back it up. It’s a “theory” that, along with a lack of price transparency, confuses the issues. In the story, a Boston woman tries to reject an ambulance out of fear of the price, even though she had no idea what that price would be.

Both situations (knowing the exorbitant price and not knowing anything about the price) actually miss the point. And that IS the point. When we only look at things surface deep, we often have the wrong conversation about why things need to change.

In the case of the Boston incident, it’s not a question of whether we do or do not know the price of an ambulance. The real point is that if the price was publicly known, we wouldn’t be charged irrational prices for ambulances and emergency services and thus there would be nothing to fear in the first place. If prices were known, they wouldn’t be irrationally high for long. And, given just a little bit of time, prices would actually come down—not rise—year after year. That prices will come down is not merely a theory, it’s a fact—evidenced by 250 years of experience with a little known American concept called “the free market.”

You can call the long-term effect on prices a second-order effect if you like. Knowing the price we’ll pay today is the first-order effect and it’s one very small reason why we need transparent prices in healthcare. The long-term effects—second- and third-order effects—will be much more significant.

Yesterday was Independence Day. So let’s celebrate American independence by reflecting on what works in America to keep us independent—free market competition that drives down prices by increasing competition. And while we’re at it, let’s reflect on a second American principle: standing up for the little guy. In America, those who are most affected by exorbitant and ever-rising healthcare prices are those who can least afford the cost and who have the least power to do anything about it.

If you are out and about over the next few days, look for the red shirts that say “Healthcare Price Transparency” on the front, and #trust on the back. We’re in the home stretch.

Thanks for your support!




Well done to the jury, the patient, and the attorneys who took on a Colorado hospital and won. You can read here about how (and why) Lisa French fought back against Centura’s attempt to collect $229,000 based on their fictitious chargemaster prices. That any hospital would sue a patient for that money—already deemed unreasonable by the patient’s insurance carrier and every other source of information available, not to mention common sense—is shameful. Hospitals like Centura should have their non-profit status revoked. What, exactly, is it that they do for the community to warrant their tax-free status? Let’s hope Colorado’s next Attorney General makes this a priority.

Perhaps the more important story, however, is the one that’s not here—which is why such an important story is not being covered by the Colorado media. It seems the media is as scared of the healthcare industry as everyone else. Can print media survive without hospital, insurance company, and pharmaceutical advertisers? The healthcare industry has all but shut down the media. The occasional story by 9News’s Chris Vanderveen is about all we see. If the healthcare industry can shut down the local media, where does that leave us?



All over the country, teachers have been protesting due to inadequate pay. And all over the country, candidates for office—those running for governor, in particular—have been promising salary increases for teachers. Don’t believe them. Most politicians will tell teachers whatever they want to hear in order to win their vote.

Now don’t get me wrong, many candidates are sincere—sort of. What I mean by that is that they’d like to see teachers paid better and they will advocate for them, but it’s not up to governors to honor such promises. In the end, it’s up to legislators and voters. Pay raises for teachers, after all, have to be paid for with taxes.

If we really want to pay teachers more on an ongoing basis, we have to solve the root cause of the problem. If we don’t, teachers are going to be protesting the inaction of feckless politicians again next year. And even if teachers win raises, we’ll be having this discussion again just a few years later as the root cause of the problem will not have been solved.

The problem is not that we don’t value our teachers. I certainly do. Most people I know do. The root cause is the incredible transfer of well over $1 trillion a year to the healthcare industry. It’s a wealth transfer unprecedented in history and it happens every year. One trillion dollars is the low end for estimates of waste and excessive profiteering by monopolistic hospitals, insurance carriers, and pharmaceutical companies. One trillion dollars is also how much we spend on K-12 public school education. Imagine that.

And it’s not just teachers who are affected. State and local government treasuries are being drained by healthcare expenses at an alarming rate, affecting firefighters, police officers, sanitation workers, transportation departments, and just about every other public service we depend on.

While state and local government employees are experiencing a sharp decline in the value of their healthcare benefits due to higher premiums, copays, deductibles, and the obscenely high prices they pay for medical care, the value of health insurance industry stocks has risen five-fold over the past ten years. Hospitals are also making good money. According to a 2018 report to Congress, hospital profit margins are at a thirty-year high.

Believe me, if all we do is raise teachers’ salaries, the healthcare industry will find a way to take it away from them. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t do it—teachers deserve a raise—but we cannot ignore the broader problem. If we do, all we’re doing is kicking the can down the road.

When teachers complain about their healthcare benefits, they’re addressing only a tiny part of the problem. The bigger impact is the cost of providing healthcare benefits to all of the other local and state workers. As healthcare costs rise, spending on other services—including education—must necessarily fall. That includes teachers’ salaries. In half of Colorado’s schools, kids are only getting four days of education a week because of budget cuts, and the graduation requirements are so light that many can easily graduate in three or three and a half years. It’s ultimately the kids who are suffering.

The great transfer of wealth from the private sector and local government to the healthcare industry is the ultimate cause of low teacher salaries. I hope teachers will join me in solving this problem. We can do it—for Colorado and for the whole country—by ensuring that Colorado Initiative #146 makes it to the ballot in November. The Colorado ballot measure is the first of its kind in the nation, requiring complete price transparency and thus ensuring competitive prices that will drive down costs and protect us from the price gouging that goes on every day.

It’s an arduous process to get a law on the ballot in Colorado. It takes ten times as many signatures as getting on the ballot to run for governor. If every teacher across America will donate $5 for each of their family members, we will get it done. When we do, transparent pricing and competition will follow. And that is the key to freeing up the money to pay teachers better. We’ve raised $158,725 over the past three weeks. We need another $41,175 to hit our requirement of $200,000 for the month to keep our signature collectors out there. Please consider making a small donation to help us get there. We’re doing this for every American—and most importantly, for our children.



In early May, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Alex Azar, was delivering a speech to the Federation of American Hospitals. He had these simple words to share:

“Imagine a day when healthcare delivery in the United States functions the way other parts of our economy do. We as patients would pick providers with the level of information we have when using Amazon or Yelp. Consumers would drive quality and cost-effectiveness with information, competition and genuine choice.”

Soon after, former U.S. Senator Tom Coburn, a longtime champion of sensible, market-driven healthcare reform, shared his thoughts on what we are trying to do here in Colorado.

“The Secretary’s key word is ‘function.’ Right now, at 18% of GDP and expanding, our healthcare system is entirely dysfunctional. A measure making its way toward the November ballot in Colorado is the first and only active effort in the nation that truly addresses this. That’s why every American should support the people of Colorado right now.”

Secretary Azar continued during his May speech with the following:

“Some argue healthcare is simply different and is and should be immune from market forces. I simply disagree. Real competition — in the economic sense — has never really been fully tried in our bizarre, third-party payer system.”

And I just came across this report in the American Journal of Medicine. The study repeats a study that was done in 2016, using a common medical procedure (hip replacement, formerly referred to as Total Hip Arthroplasty, or THA) as a proxy for transparent pricing. They looked at the period 2012 through 2016. Here is its conclusion:

“We found no evidence of improvement in hospitals’ ability to provide estimates on reductions in the estimated price for THA between 2012 and 2016. Our results provide sobering evidence that substantial efforts from government and industry to improve price transparency have had little tangible effect on availability of prices.”

In fact, the study suggests we’ve gone backwards.

The study itself is an illustration of why our system is so broken. While the data is credible, the academic-speak that stands between it and real change is palpable. I also find words in the study’s discussion naïve when it cites, “…substantial efforts from government and industry to improve pricing transparency have had little tangible effect on availability of prices.” Really? Substantial effort? While the study’s authors rely on data to conclude no progress has been made, I have to wonder what data led them to believe there had been “substantial effort.” The truth is that numbers don’t lie, and the lack of progress clearly tells us that there’s been no serious effort, just five years (the time between studies) of excessive profit-taking on the basis of price obfuscation and collusion.

We often talk about the waste in healthcare—waste due to unnecessary tests and procedures, redundant testing, and a highly corrupt and inefficient system of claims management. Perhaps it’s time to start talking about the reciprocal of waste: excessive, uneconomically earned profit. You see, that trillion-plus dollars a year we waste has to go somewhere, and much of it goes to the bottom line of monopolistic healthcare giants. One man’s waste is another’s profit. The Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) is a case in point. One of the many unintended consequences of Obamacare has been the transfer of great wealth from patients and tax payers (which is really one and the same) to the healthcare industry. States were promised that coverage for more people would mean increased patient volumes, thus driving down costs (as happens in every other industry). Yet the opposite has happened. Prices have gone up—and taxpayers are paying for it. How can that be? Easy—without competition, there’s no linkage between volume and cost.

The ineffectiveness of government, and legislatures, leaves us no choice. The people have to take charge. That’s why we need your support.

Last week, Senator Coburn helped us raise over $100,000 from outside the state in a single day. That’s terrific, but it’s also a concern. As the Senator said, “Every American should be supporting the people of Colorado right now.” If you live in Colorado, please help me ensure the rest of the country knows, “we’re in.” And if you don’t live in Colorado, please consider supporting us anyway. What we are doing in Colorado is for every American.

I’ll close with one last excerpt from Secretary Azar’s speech:

“Simply put, our current system may be working for many. But it’s not working for patients and it’s not working for the taxpayer.”

If you read between the lines, “the many” does not refer to many Americans. It refers to many healthcare industry giants.

If you have not yet contributed to Broken Healthcare, no matter where you live, please consider making a small contribution right now.

And if you have donated before, please consider making another contribution. This is America, and for better or worse, nothing changes without money behind it.

Thank you for your support.



Healthcare prices in the U. S. are growing twice as fast as you think. To understand this phenomenon, which should convince everyone that tackling healthcare prices must be the Trump Administration’s top domestic priority, consider the following:

The United spends double, on a per capita basis, what other similarly developed countries spend on healthcare, while getting lesser healthcare outcomes. We do not visit the doctor more often. We visit less—far less. In fact, in the United States on average, we visit the doctor 40% less often than the average across all OECD nations. That means we are spending twice as much money to see doctors 40% less often. Now, you might think that’s because we’re healthier, but we’re not. As it happens, the United States has seen improvements in life expectancy come to halt over the past two years. It’s the first time in 50 years that a drop in life expectancy has been recorded two years in a row. Growing healthcare prices also cannot be explained by more drugs or more surgical procedures. According to the Health Care Cost Institute, almost all of the growth in healthcare spending can be attributed to one thing—rising prices. And when prices are rising faster than the rate of inflation, the money is going somewhere—mostly to profits that are not rewards for providing more or better service. That, in turn, explains why the stock prices of health insurance carriers are up twice as much as the stock market (which is up over 100% itself since the implementation of the ACA).

So, back to the original point—why healthcare spending is rising twice as fast as you think. Consider that we spend, on average, about $10,000 on healthcare for every man, woman and child in the United States each year (it’s actually a little more, but $10,000 makes the math easy). Right now healthcare spending is rising at two to three times the rate of inflation. But for arguments sake, let’s just assume it’s double and call that 4% (inflation was 1.9% in Q1 2018). That means we should expect healthcare spending to rise $400 per American each year. However, that $400 is calculated by multiplying the inflation rate by the prior year’s spending ($10,000 in this example). If we were only spending $5,000 per capita, then the annual increase would by 4% x $5,000 = $200.

That’s why even restraining the growth of healthcare spending to the rate of inflation is allowing it to grow faster than it should—twice as fast, in fact ($400 per person as opposed to $200 per person).

Over the coming decades, we have to drive prices down, not just keep them flat, because growth at the inflation rate will ensure we perpetually have a healthcare system that consumes twice the economic resources that it otherwise should.

The oversized cost basis of our healthcare system is why I’m calling for a target growth rate of zero. Even at that rate, it will take decades for prices to come down to where they should be. For now, let’s call a zero growth rate about 2% slower than the inflation rate, and 4-6% slower than the healthcare inflation rate. If we can do that, we return approximately $200 billion per year to the U.S. economy for investment in other things such as infrastructure, education, and the growth of small businesses.

$200 billion in economic stimulus—every year—is bigger than any tax cut. That’s $2 trillion over the next decade. And when you consider that government pays half the healthcare bill in this country, a concerted effort to drive down healthcare prices effectively pays for the recently enacted tax cuts. There is no greater gift that Trump and Republicans can give to Americans than attacking healthcare spending. Democrats should join them.

But…it has to be done right. Squeezing prices by simply lowering Medicare reimbursement or reducing the money states have for Medicare is not the answer. The answer is ensuring that competitive market forces drive prices down by improving service while encouraging innovation and efficiency. That way we don’t short change the healthcare people are receiving. When we cut Medicare and Medicaid prices, two things tend to happen. First, seniors and those most in need of our help have a tougher time getting the access to the healthcare they need. Second, an ever-greater share of costs is passed on to the private sector. Cutting spending doesn’t really save money in the long term. Only by allowing competitive forces to drive down prices can we ensure it’s done efficiently and effectively.

So please, help support our effort to ensure real price transparency that empowers consumers and the market to do what needs to be done. Please consider making a donation to the Broken Healthcare Action Fund today. We need $20,000 by the end of the week to keep the signature collection going. We have until the first week of August to get all of the signatures necessary to make sure Coloradans have the right to vote on price transparency in November, setting an example for the rest of the nation. We’re in the homestretch, but we need your help.



Note: If you are new to Broken Healthcare or just want to catch up, we’ve put together this page with the best and most useful reading all summarized in one place.

First, an update. This weekend saw the launch of the second phase of signature collection for Colorado Initiative 146. Phase one started with volunteers and a small team. Over the past few weeks, we’ve been ramping up and this weekend, we had dozens of new people all over the Denver metro area at big events like the Bolder Boulder.

With dozens of paid signature collectors out there, the costs are piling up fast. If this is an effort you believe in and you expect to benefit from yourself, please consider making an investment now to ensure we get it done (hint: everyone benefits from lower healthcare costs).

“Until the great mass of the people shall be filled with the sense of responsibility for each other’s welfare, social justice can never be attained.”
-Helen Keller

“Every social justice movement that I know of has come out of people sitting in small groups, telling their life stories, and discovering that other people have shared similar experiences.”
-Gloria Steinem

“Throughout history, it has been the inaction of those who could have acted; the indifference of those who should have known better; the silence of the voice of justice when it mattered most; that has made it possible for evil to triumph.”
-Haile Selassie

“The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see.”
-Ayn Rand


Bundling? Fragmentation? These are words that most of us don’t use every day. Yet the healthcare industry uses them all the time—very strategically—to maximize profits at our expense.

Bundles are easy to understand. When you order a number six at McDonalds, you pay a bundled price. If you order a cheeseburger, a drink, and fries separately, you expect the teller to say to you, “Would you prefer the meal, ma’am? It’s a better price.” Or better yet, you just expect them to do it for you. And the last thing you expect them to do, when you order a number six, is to “unbundle” it and charge you separately for the burger, soda, and fries in order to charge you a little more. Yet this is what healthcare providers—hospitals in particular—do to unsuspecting patients. The result, however, is not a little more. In healthcare, it can be a lot more.

Good businesses empower their employees to help customers get the best price on their goods and services. But then again, good businesses don’t generally give people titles like, “Revenue Enhancement Specialist.” (seriously—that’s the title on a letter I received from a hospital).

In healthcare, unbundling, sometimes called “fragmentation,” is used as a revenue optimization strategy. For example, you might be charged for five different blood tests, each having their own CPT code, when there was another CPT code that could have been used for a “liver panel” at a lower cost. CPT stands for Common Procedural Terminology. CPT is the system of medical coding used by healthcare providers.

While intentionally unbundling codes can be used to maximize revenue from self-paying patients and private insurance patients, it goes by another name when billing Medicare: fraud. There are ways around that even with Medicare. But unbundling and “up-coding” (using the coding system as a weapon, carefully choosing codes to minimize the likelihood of procedures being bundled) most often affects privately insured and uninsured patients. 

This is one of the many of examples of our government’s conflict of interest in healthcare. It writes rules to protect itself, while not extending those same protections to the rest of us. And in the process, it creates systems that confuse us, which provides the industry with ever-better weapons to use against us. 

Efforts are underway to change that by making it a condition of payment or participation in federal programs to extend the same protections to us that are enjoyed by government payers. But don’t kid yourself. The special interests are hard at work, sowing confusion, to minimize anything that might impact the bottom line. And, the system is so complex that these schemes still cost government payers a lot, too, even though many providers are being taken to task for fraud every year.

What about insurers? Well, insurance carriers only protect patients or employers when it’s in their best interest. With insurance carriers, if we are not going to hit our increasingly high deductibles this year, it’s not worth much to them to invest in correcting our fragmented bills. It doesn’t save them anything and, when still within your deductible limits, it doesn’t save your employer anything, either. So why fight the higher cost calculations just for us, the patients? 

While I think they have a duty to protect us, acting in the best interest of the patients and employers they represent is not a duty that insurance carriers accept is theirs. They will tell you that they legally have no such duty. That’s something that needs to be changed, and it needs to be tested in the courts.

And when they are bumping against medical loss ratio limits (see Weapons of Mass Corruption, Part II), allowing unbundling helps drive payouts up, thereby maximizing profits.

Most patients and employers are oblivious to the practice of unbundling. At best, they might be able to go online and find an estimated price for a specific CPT code. There is nothing that will tell a patient that the CPT codes on their bill should have been bundled into a single, different code. They’d need to be a medical coding expert for that. By creating a system that requires such expertise, we have enabled unbundling abuse.

The complex nature of medical coding itself is an enabler to all kinds of corruption. Each year, hundreds—sometimes thousands—of codes are added to the system, along with “modifiers,” just to make things a little more complex. 

To protect itself against malicious unbundling, CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) launched a program known as the “Correct Coding Initiative.” Unfortunately, the benefits of this program, again, are strictly for CMS. The Correct Coding Initiative does not extend to the private sector. 

“In the absence of justice, what is sovereignty but organized robbery?” 
-Saint Augustine


The result of unbundling is, often times, that when billing patients at chargemaster prices (see Weapons of Mass Corruption, Part I), not only are the charges inflated by 10x, 20x or more than Medicare or an in-network insurance carrier would be charged, the unbundling results in even more obscene overcharging.

The bottom line: there is tremendous waste, fraud, and abuse in healthcare that is facilitated by complexity and price obfuscation. Anyone that doubts that serious price transparency will bring healthcare costs down hasn’t woken up to how they, and/or their employer, are being scammed every day.

Also telling: you’ll notice that no one is writing about why the corruption I write about is wrong or inaccurate. Instead, they’re scheming about how to defeat us through negative advertising in the fall. A marketing firm has already been hired. The ads are being conceptualized. The challenge they’re facing is what to tell you that would get you (if you live in Colorado) to vote against this measure. Here are the ideas they’re working with, from what I hear:

  1. It will stifle competition and drive costs up.
  2. Insurance carriers will pull out of the state.
  3. It’s a violation of their constitutional rights.
  4. It’s more bureaucracy and more cost for doctors, which will in turn cause your prices to go up.

Oh, and on the last item—they’re torn. That’s doing a smear campaign on me. The risk, or so I hear, is that it could somehow raise my profile instead of squashing me. So they’re not sure yet if they want to go with that strategy. 

So, on top of the games and scams they play with us, they are prepared to lie to us, too. Ask yourself, is that a healthcare system we can #trust? Are these companies we can #trust? I don’t think so. And the only thing that’s going to cure this very sickly beast is to shine a bright light on it. All of it. And in Colorado, that means passing Initiative #146 to set an example for the rest of the country.


Would you donate to the Broken Healthcare Action Fund to if it meant better and safer U.S. schools?

For many months, I’ve been writing to you about skyrocketing healthcare costs, disparate prices for haves and have nots, the corruption that pushes prices ever higher, and the staggering amounts of money used to persuade politicians to maintain the unfair and wasteful status quo as it relates to discriminatory pricing policies. We are fighting for a “proof of concept” Colorado ballot initiative which would require full healthcare price transparency to reduce healthcare prices and increase healthcare quality.

While most of us agree that change is necessary, recruiting both donations and volunteers has, at times, been slow as healthcare reform is just one of a number of critical, hot-button issues competing for attention and resources. But what if we look at what transforming our healthcare system would mean for some of those other issues occupying our hearts and minds? There is a very simple, but important, connection between fixing the broken healthcare system and fixing many of the other pressing problems facing our nation. Fixing most problems will cost money. Fixing the U.S. healthcare system can provide those critical funds.

Let’s look at education quality and school safety.

All across the country, teachers have been protesting low pay and poor benefits. As we head toward the November elections, politicians are staking out their positions as saviors of teachers with promises of better pay. And, of course, the mounting death tolls related to school shootings mean almost every state legislature is looking at costly school safety bills (in addition to controversial gun control measures). But while talk is cheap, good education in a safe environment costs money. So how do we pay for it?

The answer is right in front of us.

Annual healthcare spending in the United States has topped $3.5 trillion, or 18% of GDP. Of that, we waste between $1 and $1.5 trillion every year. More than one-third. Wherever the actual number lies, it is easy to understand what that kind of money would mean to students and teachers in this country.

The entire K-12 public education budget in the United States is less than $1 trillion. That’s right—we WASTE more money in our healthcare system than we spend, in total, on primary and secondary education. This may be why teacher protests in Colorado are among the best places to collect signatures for our healthcare ballot initiative. In addition to sub-standard salaries, teachers are experiencing what many government workers at the state and municipal level are experiencing—skyrocketing healthcare costs and declining benefits on sub-par salaries. It’s an ugly picture.

At the end of the day, though, it’s not about the teachers. It’s about the kids. And as healthcare consumes an ever-larger share of tax dollars and personal incomes, we’re wasting money that could otherwise be spent on education and school safety measures. The money we waste in healthcare is rotting our country from the inside out—forcing legislators to make choices they don’t need to make.

Unfortunately, those best in a position to do something about it are not feeling the pain on a day-to-day basis and are not helping to promote big picture solutions.

This is America’s biggest problem today—there is not enough empathy among the affluent to drive real change.

Reforming our healthcare system, starting with serious price transparency that drives competition and forces prices down and quality up, can provide the funds to significantly improve the quality and safety of primary and secondary schools. We could pay teachers better and improve our public schools. We could fund vouchers for private schools at the same time. We waste enough money in healthcare to improve the safety and quality of our nation’s schools and tackle some other underfunded systems while we’re at it.

The bottom line is that we’ve been talking a lot about how healthcare price transparency reform will reduce healthcare prices and increase quality. But maybe instead of trying to compete with other major issues for the hearts and minds of the American public, it’s time to start talking about how one single effort—reducing healthcare prices—can change lives in so many other critical ways. Shedding a bright light on healthcare pricing abuse, creating real competition that drives prices down, and providing a single set of prices for all patients not only reduces the great health divide in this country, but will also reduce the great wealth divide in so many other areas. Isn’t that worth a real investment?



Is Tri-Partisan a word? Probably not, but it doesn’t matter. Because all I really want to say is that Colorado’s Healthcare Price Transparency Ballot Measure is truly NON-partisan.

Colorado’s effort to enact real price transparency in healthcare went to committee in the Colorado House with strong bipartisan sponsorship and support from Democrats and Republicans. Now the Libertarian Party of Colorado has added its endorsement, agreeing that every Coloradan should have the right to do what the legislature couldn’t—vote to ensure we have free, fair and competitive markets in healthcare.

I’d like to thank Wayne Harlos, the party chair, and the entire board of the Libertarian party for their endorsement. Sitting in on their board meeting, it was clear to me that free, fair and competitive markets are among their most important values. As Americans, we should all feel the same way. We have over two hundred years of experience telling us that the most powerful force in the world is that of the free market.

While there are many well-intentioned politicians trying to figure out how to improve our healthcare system, in the end they can’t do it alone. Government can ensure the safety of healthcare systems and can promote access to healthcare by subsidizing the cost for those who need our help, but government has never proven successful at driving down cost or promoting greater efficiency. Government cannot substitute for the forces of the market in ensuring proper supply and demand balances, simplifying the business side of healthcare, and ensuring the voice of the patient is truly reflected in the healthcare delivery market. That is all best accomplished through competitive forces.

Government payers already comprise more than 50% of healthcare (Medicare, Medicaid, the VA, the military, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, government employees, and others). While there is no clear path to getting government out of healthcare, and that is not our focus right now, we can partner with government by ensuring a highly functional and competitive marketplace that drives the benefits of free and fair markets. That can only be done by us—the people. Many other aspects of government are built on competitive foundations. The Department of Defense allows companies to bid to make everything from bullets to fighter jets. Contractors compete for government highway contracts. But in healthcare, free market competition is absent because a small group of highly monopolistic companies dominate the system. These private sector forces not only control the private insurance side of the market, they also control government with their big money influence. Believe it or not, it is not government sponsored healthcare that is the problem here. It is the big money pharmaceutical companies, health insurance carriers, and monopolistic hospital systems that fight to maintain the limits on competition, both in the government sector and the private sector. The problem is politics, not government-run healthcare. We saw that last week as President Trump signaled that he would back off of his promise to allow Medicare to negotiate drug prices.

The legalized cloud of secrecy that is the current norm in healthcare protects these dynasties and their unfair profit streams from competitive forces, whether the buyer is a government agency or the private sector. Sometimes, you have to know who your enemy really is in order to effectively combat it.

We can only get this done with your help. We need to end the BS in healthcare pricing and to have a little fun to help the fundraising, we’ve just had 1,000 BS Flags (see below) donated to Broken Healthcare. Until we run out, donate $25 and we’ll send you an official BS Flag. Donate $50 or more and we’ll send you ten of them to share with your friends.  Even if you’ve donated before, we have two months of signature collection to go and we need to raise a lot more money to get it done.



I know what you’re thinking: How can knowing your out-of-pocket healthcare costs be used as Weapon of Mass Corruption? Read on…

A 2014 article in Modern Healthcare reads, “New CMS policy on releasing doc pay data and ACA provision requiring hospitals to disclose charges may signal full price transparency is inevitable.” The article is worth reading, as are the links in the article.

It’s 2018. In many ways, we’ve taken steps backwards since 2014. The article was optimistic. The reality is, it never happened. Hospitals are still not complying with the ACA and no penalties have been imposed on them. The suggestions this week (about 11 minutes into the video) by HHS Secretary Alex Azar that transparency is coming is refreshing, but we should all be skeptical about the implementation of any such rules. They didn’t happen in 2014 and they’re not likely to happen now. That’s what we have to keep the pressure on. The healthcare industry lobbies hard. It makes “suggestions” to regulators. But ask yourself, who is making suggestions as the representatives of patients and employers? No one.

The healthcare industry has taken control of the conversation and, in many ways, has snowed government officials. When it comes to drug prices, here’s a quote from a VOX article a couple of days ago: “Under Trump, drug companies have undertaken a concerted campaign to shift the discussion about drug prices to a conversation about out-of-pocket costs.”

Knowing our out-of-pocket costs accomplishes nothing. In fact, in many ways, it plays into the drug companies’, hospitals’, and insurance carriers’ games. When it comes to drugs, if all we know is our out-of-pocket cost and not what our insurance carrier is paying, then we are doing nothing to drive costs down by making better decisions. If in one place a drug costs $100 and in another it costs $50, but we only know that we have a $10 co-pay (i.e., “out-of-pocket”) then who is pushing for the $50 price? No one. And thus this game of charades leads to higher prices for us and our employers. Partial transparency equals no transparency. That’s why “out-of-pocket costs” is a Weapon of Mass Corruption.

As this article suggests, we are stuck with “half-measures” and the truth is that partial transparency equals no transparency. Legislative philosophy in this country promotes the idea of incremental steps. But in this case, the healthcare industry is carefully guiding those steps. And in doing so, they are perpetuating the status quo by creating the illusion of progress. The truth is that partial transparency is the same as no transparency, so incrementalism accomplishes nothing.

Imagine going into a supermarket where the price of everything is on display. When you check out, your bill reads, “$146.50.” You turn to the clerk and say, “I’d like an itemized receipt,” so she reprints it. This time it says: Vegetables: $15.98, Fruits: $13.12, Deli: $9.95, Paper Goods: $12.76 and so on. Then you say, “no, no, no…I want a truly itemized receipt.” This time it lists everything out, just the way you’re used to, but at the bottom is says, “after you leave the store, our analysts assess a service charge that will show up on your credit card bill. It is based on the following factors: a) how much time you spent in the store, b) how many things you removed from the shelves and replaced, c) whether you used a basket or shopping cart, d) whether you bagged yourself or we bagged for you, and e) whether or not you took up a parking spot in the parking lot.”

Not knowing if that service charge might be $1 or $100, you realize that knowing the prices of everything else turns out to be relatively useless because over time, the store has been shifting more and more cost into the service charge while bringing down the price of other things — creating the façade of lower prices.

These are the kinds of games played in healthcare. Secrecy enables the system to cheat us and our employers every day. Only complete transparency, without incrementalism or half-measures, will get the job done.

If you live in Colorado, please contribute to the Broken Healthcare Action Fund to help us change the law at the ballot box in November. We are collecting 140,000 signatures and it’s proving to be a very costly process. Volunteers have been great, but they can’t collect the more than 1,000 signatures we need every day.

And if you live outside of Colorado, please contribute to where we help patients all over the country fight their bills and raise awareness of the issue of price secrecy. We’ve launched a GoFundMe account which is the easiest way to make a tax-deductible contribution and it’s very easy to share with your friends on Facebook or anywhere else. Even if you’ve given before, we need your help. Just $5 for each family member that ever results in a medical bill makes all the difference in the world. And please…share the GoFundMe campaign on your own social media account.

In the end, we need to build a system we can all #trust. We can only do it with your help.



Sign Up to Stay Informed